United States District Court, Eastern District of California Sue Heinemann acted as the expert witness on behalf of the defendant regarding damages from alleged breach of contract and incorrect patent inventorship related to the sale of produce crates. Ms. Heinemann’s … Read More
A Nathan expert submitted an expert report regarding class certification in Mednick et al. v. Precor, Inc., a consumer fraud class action regarding allegedly defective heart rate monitors on Precor treadmills. The Court relied on Nathan’s expert in his order … Read More
A Nathan expert served as the testifying expert for plaintiff in I3B Medical v. Resmed et al., an antitrust case involving alleged exclusive dealing and anticompetitive foreclosure in the market for medical devices used in treating sleep apnea. The Nathan … Read More
Two Nathan expert served as testifying experts for plaintiff in Profoot v. MSD Consumer Care et al., an antitrust case involving alleged anticompetitive foreclosure via retail category management in the market for shoe inserts and insoles. The Nathan experts opined … Read More
A Nathan expert designed a methodology for distributing more than $200 million in indirect purchaser settlements for In re: DRAM Antitrust Litigation, a class action price fixing matter. The Special Master described Nathan’s methodology as fair, reasonable and adequate. Nathan’s … Read More
A Nathan expert served as the testifying expert in Dang v. San Francisco Forty Niners Ltd. et al., an antitrust class action involving Reebok’s exclusive NFL licensing agreement. Nathan’s work in the case demonstrated that all or nearly all customers … Read More
A Nathan expert served as the testifying expert for plaintiffs in Adel Tawfilis v. Allergan Inc., an antitrust class action involving allegations that Allergan artificially inflated prices for Botox by keeping a product that would have competed with Botox off … Read More
A Nathan expert served as the testifying expert for plaintiffs motion for class certification for the case In re: Korean Ramen Antitrust Litigation, an antitrust class action involving alleged price fixing by producers of Korean ramen noodles. The court relied … Read More
United States District Court, Northern District of California Sue Heinemann performed a forensic analysis related to an alleged kickback arrangement between a Fry’s employee and various vendors. Ms. Heinemann’s work included reconciliation of purchase orders, vendor invoices, vendor payment reports, … Read More
Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles Sue Heinemann acted as expert witness on behalf of the defendant concerning business interruption claims resulting from the Sayre wildfire in 2008. Ms. Heinemann’s work included a forensic investigation … Read More