Superior Court of the State of California, County of Santa Clara Sue Heinemann acted as the expert witness on behalf of the defendant regarding damages from the alleged breach of an oral agreement to purchase automotive real estate in San … Read More
United States Court of Federal Claims Sue Heinemann acted as the expert witness on behalf of the plaintiff concerning lost profits and reasonable royalties from infringement of copyrighted software. Ms. Heinemann’s work included analysis of software license rates and maintenance … Read More
United States District Court, Central District of California Sue Heinemann acted as the expert witness on behalf of the defendant regarding damages from breach of earnout provision in contract with Internet Brands. Ms. Heinemann’s work included analysis of website visits … Read More
Nathan, with funding from USAID and in partnership with the TADAT Secretariat, has supported Tax Administration Diagnostic Assessment Tool (TADAT) assessments in seven countries, including in Rwanda, Ethiopia, Kenya, Liberia, Armenia, Guatemala, and Nigeria. Nathan has also supported training for … Read More
United States District Court, Eastern District of California Sue Heinemann acted as the expert witness on behalf of the defendant regarding damages from alleged breach of contract and incorrect patent inventorship related to the sale of produce crates. Ms. Heinemann’s … Read More
A Nathan expert submitted an expert report regarding class certification in Mednick et al. v. Precor, Inc., a consumer fraud class action regarding allegedly defective heart rate monitors on Precor treadmills. The Court relied on Nathan’s expert in his order … Read More
A Nathan expert served as the testifying expert for plaintiff in I3B Medical v. Resmed et al., an antitrust case involving alleged exclusive dealing and anticompetitive foreclosure in the market for medical devices used in treating sleep apnea. The Nathan … Read More
Two Nathan expert served as testifying experts for plaintiff in Profoot v. MSD Consumer Care et al., an antitrust case involving alleged anticompetitive foreclosure via retail category management in the market for shoe inserts and insoles. The Nathan experts opined … Read More
A Nathan expert designed a methodology for distributing more than $200 million in indirect purchaser settlements for In re: DRAM Antitrust Litigation, a class action price fixing matter. The Special Master described Nathan’s methodology as fair, reasonable and adequate. Nathan’s … Read More
A Nathan expert served as the testifying expert in Dang v. San Francisco Forty Niners Ltd. et al., an antitrust class action involving Reebok’s exclusive NFL licensing agreement. Nathan’s work in the case demonstrated that all or nearly all customers … Read More